Tell Us What Happened
Provide the order details, a clear explanation, useful evidence and the outcome you are requesting.
CUSTOMER CARE & RESOLUTION
Learn how Marble Trays receives, reviews and resolves customer complaints, how concerns can be escalated and what happens when an issue cannot be resolved informally.
Provide the order details, a clear explanation, useful evidence and the outcome you are requesting.
Marble Trays will confirm receipt through the available support channel and may request missing information.
The concern will be assessed using order records, submitted evidence, applicable policies and relevant communications.
When the first response does not resolve the concern, the complaint may be escalated through the applicable internal process.
Marble Trays is committed to receiving and reviewing complaints fairly, respectfully and without unnecessary delay. This policy explains the general process used when a customer remains dissatisfied with a product, order, delivery, service, payment, refund, bespoke project or earlier support response.
Customers should normally give Marble Trays a reasonable opportunity to understand and respond to the concern before pursuing an external route, unless urgent action or a mandatory legal right requires otherwise.
This policy should be read with the policy that applies to the underlying issue. Mandatory rights that cannot lawfully be excluded remain unaffected.
A complaint is an expression of dissatisfaction about a product, order, delivery, service, communication, payment, refund, bespoke process or earlier decision that requires a response or resolution.
A general question, quotation request, material enquiry, delivery update request or request for information is not automatically treated as a formal complaint. The team may direct that request to the most suitable support route.
The complaint process may be used for matters connected with products, orders, quotations, delivery, packaging, customer service, bespoke work, payments, refunds, repairs, replacements, warranty support and website-led transactions.
A privacy request, routine product enquiry or first report of delivery damage may be handled more efficiently through the dedicated policy or contact route before it becomes a formal complaint.
Order preparation, packaging, courier communication, delivery access and shipment outcomes.
Product specification, natural-stone characteristics, finishing, hardware and quality concerns.
Quotations, drawings, approvals, changes, material selection and made-to-order production.
Charged amounts, deposits, payment-provider processing, cancellations and approved refunds.
Review the policy relevant to the issue, check the confirmed order information and collect the evidence that will help the team understand what happened.
Retain the product, packaging, labels, drawings, quotation, payment record and previous communication where they are relevant. Stop using the product when continued use could worsen the concern or affect an inspection.
Use the current Contact & Consultation form and choose the complaint or general-support route. The form supports order details, an explanation, preferred outcome and reference uploads using the website’s existing secure enquiry workflow.
Where an email, telephone or WhatsApp contact is publicly available in the contact database, the team may also use that channel to continue the discussion. A complete written submission is normally the clearest starting point.
Only information reasonably needed to understand and investigate the complaint should be submitted. Do not send payment-card details, passwords or unrelated identity documents through the public form.
Receipt may be acknowledged through the channel used for submission or another verified contact method. The acknowledgement may confirm that the complaint has been received, identify missing information and explain the next review step.
An acknowledgement is not a final decision and does not confirm that a particular remedy is available. Any target for acknowledgement or follow-up must be the current target stated by the business at the time of submission.
The first review may determine whether the submission is complete, which policy applies, whether urgent action is required, whether the issue has already been addressed and whether another team or service provider must contribute.
The reviewer may ask for a clearer description, additional photographs, a copy of the approved specification, payment evidence or permission to inspect the product before the investigation proceeds.
The review may consider order records, quotations, approved specifications, product and packaging photographs, delivery records, payment information, quality-control notes, workshop records, courier information, previous communications and the policies in effect for the order.
Depending on the issue, Marble Trays may request further evidence, a product inspection, return or collection, local assessment, courier information, third-party information or workshop review. The scope should remain proportionate to the concern.
RESOLUTION PROCESS
The exact route depends on the complaint, evidence and applicable policy, but the review can follow these general stages.
The customer provides the concern and available evidence.
The submission is recorded and missing information may be requested.
The applicable policy, urgency and responsible reviewer are identified.
Relevant order, product, delivery and communication records are assembled.
The facts and applicable terms are reviewed impartially.
Findings and the proposed next step are communicated.
The response is completed or moved to an internal escalation.
The agreed action is completed or the final internal position is recorded.
CHOOSE THE RIGHT ROUTE
Starting with the most relevant route helps the correct information reach the right team.
Product selection, material, size or care enquiry.
Damage, missing contents or an incorrect delivered item.
Fabrication, finishing, hardware or stability concern.
Eligibility, collection and refund-process information.
Question or request concerning personal information.
A concern remains unresolved after the normal support route.
Request internal escalation using the existing complaint reference.
OUR APPROACH
Complaints should be handled professionally and without unnecessary confrontation.
Available evidence and applicable policies should be considered rather than assumptions.
The investigation and proposed response should reflect the nature and seriousness of the issue.
Information should be shared only with people or providers who reasonably need it for review and resolution.
Current targets for acknowledgement, initial review, investigation, escalated review and final internal response must be managed through verified business content or the communication sent for the individual complaint.
Timing can depend on complaint complexity, evidence availability, product inspection, courier involvement, bespoke records, third-party information, international delivery, public holidays and the customer’s response time.
| Stage | Current target | What may affect it |
|---|---|---|
| Acknowledgement | Confirmed through the support channel | Submission completeness and contact verification |
| Initial review | Confirmed for the individual complaint | Policy routing and evidence availability |
| Investigation | Depends on the matter | Inspection, courier, workshop or third-party information |
| Escalated review | Confirmed when escalation is accepted | Complexity and reviewer availability |
| Final response | Confirmed during the process | Completion of required investigation steps |
The appropriate outcome depends on the facts, applicable policy, product, location, evidence and any mandatory rights. Submitting a preferred outcome does not guarantee that the requested remedy will be available.
Information about the order, policy, product characteristic or process.
Repair, restoration, missing-item dispatch, document correction or another service correction where suitable.
Available only where supported by the relevant policy, order terms and mandatory legal rights.
A reasoned response where the complaint is unsupported, outside coverage or already resolved.
A customer may request internal escalation when they disagree with the first response, believe important evidence was not considered, have material new evidence, find that an agreed action was not completed or consider the complaint was closed prematurely.
The request should identify the complaint reference, decision being challenged, reason for disagreement, new evidence and outcome requested. Any current escalation deadline must come from verified database content or the response issued for the complaint.
Where practical, an escalated complaint may be reviewed by an authorised person who did not issue the first response. The reviewer may come from customer service, operations, quality, commercial management or another suitable function.
The final internal response may summarise the complaint, evidence reviewed, relevant policy, findings, proposed outcome and any remaining options. It should not name an external authority or legal route unless that information is verified and applicable.
The parties may resolve a complaint through clarification, direct discussion, additional inspection, a revised proposal, agreed action plan, repair, replacement, refund, delivery correction or another lawful and proportionate solution.
Any goodwill solution should be recorded clearly. Unless legally advised otherwise, a goodwill outcome for one complaint does not automatically create a general policy or admission for unrelated matters.
Where appropriate and mutually agreed, an unresolved matter may be explored through direct negotiation, mediation, conciliation or another suitable alternative resolution process.
Marble Trays should not be described as participating in a specific government, private or industry scheme unless that participation and the applicable route are verified. Any named authority or mediation body must remain database-controlled and legally reviewed.
Formal dispute action may be considered after reasonable internal steps have been attempted, unless urgent relief or a mandatory right requires a different approach.
A formal notice should identify the order, previous complaint reference, complaint history, relevant evidence, remedy requested and contractual terms relied upon. The wording and delivery method should be reviewed for the actual transaction and jurisdiction.
The governing law, emirate, court jurisdiction, consumer route and any business-to-business dispute mechanism must be determined from the verified contracting entity, licence, order documents and current legal advice.
This page intentionally does not hard-code a court, emirate, free-zone authority, arbitration centre or mediation body. The accepted order documents and legally reviewed Terms & Conditions should provide the applicable position.
Delivery complaints may concern delay, missed delivery, delivery damage, incorrect-address handling, access, courier communication, customs delay, a missing shipment, failed delivery or an inaccurate delivery status.
A first report of damage, missing contents or an incorrect delivered item should follow the evidence and packaging requirements in the dedicated order-issue policy. A complaint may be appropriate when the normal support process remains unresolved.
Product complaints may concern dimensions, shape, finish, hardware, stability, engraving, fabrication, natural-stone variation, product care or a warranty assessment.
The review should distinguish an approved specification, natural material characteristic, reasonable fabrication variation, workmanship concern, delivery damage and damage caused after receipt.
A bespoke complaint should be compared with the accepted quotation, drawing, dimensions, material, finish, edge profile, handles, feet, engraving, quantity, approved changes and customer-supplied information.
The review should identify whether the issue relates to natural variation, an approved specification, a production difference, an unapproved change, delivery damage or information supplied by the customer.
Payment complaints may concern duplicate payment, an incorrect charged amount, a delayed approved refund, deposit treatment, balance payment, currency conversion, payment-provider processing, cancellation, partial refund, failed payment or reversed payment.
Refund timing, deposit treatment, conversion fees, eligibility and responsibility must be determined from verified payment records, the accepted order documents, applicable policy and mandatory rights. They are not hard-coded in the page template.
Marble Trays may use proportionate communication controls when contact includes threats, harassment, discrimination, repeated abuse, excessive duplicate submissions, deliberate misinformation, unreasonable contact frequency, intimidation or altered evidence.
Controls may include one designated contact, written communication, defined contact windows, consolidated responses or refusal to engage with abusive language. Where reasonably possible, the underlying complaint should still be retained and reviewed on its merits.
Customers may use the current contact route for a new complaint, existing complaint, escalation request, missing acknowledgement, missing response, progress update, additional evidence, informal-resolution discussion or formal dispute notice.
Actual public email, telephone, WhatsApp, location and business hours are loaded from the existing business_contacts table. Empty or inactive contact fields are not displayed.
BEFORE YOU SUBMIT
A complete, factual submission helps the team route and review the concern efficiently.

CUSTOMER RESOLUTION
Provide your order information, supporting evidence and the outcome you are requesting so the Marble Trays team can review the concern fairly.
A formal complaint is an expression of dissatisfaction about an order, product, delivery, service, payment, refund, bespoke process or earlier response that requires review or resolution.
Use the Contact & Consultation page, choose the complaint or general-support route, provide the order details and explanation, and attach useful evidence where available.
Include current contact details, order or quotation reference, relevant dates, a clear explanation, previous support reference, evidence and the outcome you would like considered.
The acknowledgement process and any reference number depend on the current support workflow. Keep the confirmation and communication sent after submission.
The current target should be confirmed for the individual complaint. Complexity, evidence, inspection, courier involvement, third parties and customer response time can affect the review.
The submission is acknowledged, checked for completeness, routed to the appropriate reviewer and investigated using the available records and evidence.
Yes, when the support team provides a verified channel or reference for the existing complaint. Include the complaint reference so the evidence can be matched correctly.
Yes. The review will normally compare the completed work with the approved quotation, drawings, material, dimensions, finish and other accepted specifications.
Yes. Delivery damage or missing contents should first follow the dedicated order-issue process; unresolved delivery-service concerns may proceed through the complaint process.
You may request internal escalation and explain which finding you disagree with, what evidence should be reconsidered and what outcome you are requesting.
Submit an escalation request using the existing complaint reference, identify the decision challenged and provide any important new evidence.
Use the complaint contact route and clearly label the submission as an escalation. Include the complaint reference, reason for disagreement and requested outcome.
Where practical, an authorised person who did not issue the first response may review the escalation. The exact reviewer depends on the subject and business structure.
You may state your preferred outcome, but the available resolution depends on the facts, applicable policy, product, evidence, location and mandatory rights.
No. An outcome may involve explanation, corrective action, repair, replacement, refund or no further action, depending on the verified circumstances.
Yes, when the applicable policy and assessment support that outcome. Feasibility depends on the material, issue, product and location.
Marble Trays may review delivery records and request packaging photographs, tracking information or courier input before proposing the next step.
The review may need additional delivery, customs, local-inspection or return information. The practical resolution depends on the destination and issue.
Proportionate controls may be applied, such as one contact person or written communication. The underlying complaint should still be reviewed where reasonably possible.
Contact the support team through the verified channel used for the complaint and include the order number and complaint reference where available.
NEED ASSISTANCE?
Contact the Marble Trays team for support with an existing complaint, escalation request, unresolved order concern or dispute-resolution question.